考研英语阅读理解
英语阅读理解是一个很容易失分的部分，所以在日常学习中要多练习，以下是小编提供给大家的考研的英语阅读理解专题，希望能给大家一些帮助!
第一篇：
A white kid sells a bag of at his suburban high school. A Latino kid does the same in his inner-city neighborhood. Both get caught. Both are first-time offenders. The white kid walks into juvenile court with his parents, his priest, a good lawyer and medical coverage. The Latino kid walks into court with his mom, no legal resources and no insurance. The judge lets the white kid go with his family; he's placed in a private treatment program. The minority kid has no such option. He's detained.
There, in a nutshell, is what happens more and more often in the juvenile-court system. Minority youths arrested on violent felony charges in California are more than twice as likely as their white counterparts to be transferred out of the juvenile-justice system and tried as adults, according to a study released last week by the Justice Policy Institute, a research center in San Francisco. Once they are in adult courts, young black offenders are 18 times more likely to be jailed and Hispanics seven times more likely than are young white offenders. "Discrimination against kids of color accumulates at every stage of the justice system and skyrockets when juveniles are, tried as adults," says Dan Macallair, a co-author of the new study. "California has a double standard: throw kids of color behind bars, but rehabilitate white kids who commit comparable crimes."
Even as juvenile crime has declined from its peak in the early 1990s, headline grabbing violence by minors has intensified a get-tough attitude. Over the past six years, 43 states have passed laws that make it easier to try juveniles as adults. In Texas and Connecticut in 1996, the latest year for which figures are available, all the juveniles in jails were minorities. Vincent Schiraldi, the Justice Policy Institute's director, concedes that "some kids need to be tried as adults. But most can be rehabilitated."
Instead, adult prisons tend to brutalize juveniles. They are eight times more likely to commit suicide and five times more likely to be sexually abused than offenders held in juvenile detention. "Once they get out, they tend to commit more crimes and more violent crimes," says Jenni Gainsborough, a spokeswoman for the Sentencing Project, a reform group in Washington. The system, in essence, is training career criminals. And it's doing its worst work among minorities.
1. From the first paragraph we learn that ________.
[A] the white kid is more lucky than the minority kid
[B] the white kid has got a lot of help than the minority kid
[C] the white kid and the minority kid have been treated differently
[D] the minority kid should be set free at once
2. According to the passage, which of the following is TRUE?
[A] Kids shouldn't be tried as adults.
[B] Discrimination exists in the justice system.
[C] Minority kids are likely to commit crimes.
[D] States shouldn't pass the laws.
3. The word "skyrocket" (Line 7, Paragraph 2) means ________.
[A] rising sharply
[B] widening suddenly
[C] spreading widely
[D] expanding quickly
4. It can be inferred from the last paragraph that ________.
[A] something seems to be wrong with the justice system
[B] adult prisons have bad influence on the juveniles
[C] juveniles in adult prison are ill-treated
[D] the career criminals are trained by the system
5. The passage shows that the author is ________ the present situation.
[A] amazed at
[B] puzzled by
[C] disappointed at
[D] critical of
第二篇：
He emerged, all of a sudden, in 1957: the most explosive new poetic talent of the English post-war era. Poetry specialised, at that moment, in the wry chronicling of the everyday. The poetry of Yorkshire-born Ted Hughes, first published in a book called "The Hawk in the Rain" when he was 27, was unlike anything written by his immediate predecessors. Driven by an almost Jacobean rhetoric, it had a visionary fervour. Its most eye-catching characteristic was Hughes’s ability to get beneath the skins of animals: foxes, otters, pigs. These animals were the real thing all right, but they were also armorial devices-symbols of the countryside and lifeblood of the earth in which they were rooted. It gave his work a raw, primal stink.
It was not only England that thought so either. Hughes’s book was also published in America, where it won the Galbraith prize, a major literary award. But then, in 1963, Sylvia Plath, a young American poet whom he had first met at Cambridge University in 1956, and who became his wife in the summer of that year, committed suicide. Hughes was vilified for long after that, especially by feminists in America. In 1998, the year he died, Hughes broke his own self-imposed public silence about their relationship in a book of loose-weave poems called "Birthday Letters".In this new and exhilarating collection of real letters, Hughes returns to the issue of his first wife’s death, which he calls his "big and unmanageable event". He felt his talent muffled by the perpetual eavesdropping upon his every move. Not until he decided to publish his own account of their relationship did the burden begin to lighten.
The analysis is raw, pained and ruthlessly self-aware. For all the moral torment, the writing itself has the same rush and vigour that possessed Hughes’s early poetry. Some books of letters serve as a personalised historical chronicle. Poets’ letters are seldom like that, and Hughes’s are no exception. His are about a life of literary engagement: almost all of them include some musing on the state or the nature of writing, both Hughes’s own or other people’s. The trajectory of Hughes’s literary career had him moving from obscurity to fame, and then, in the eyes of many, to life-long notoriety. These letters are filled with his wrestling with the consequences of being the part-private, part-public creature that he became, desperate to devote himself to his writing, and yet subject to endless invasions of his privacy.
Hughes is an absorbing and intricate commentator upon his own poetry, even when he is standing back from it and good-humouredly condemning himself for "its fantasticalia, its pretticisms and its infinite verballifications". He also believed, from first to last, that poetry had a special place in the education of children. "What kids need", he wrote in a 1988 letter to the secretary of state for education in the Conservative government, "is a headfull [sic] of songs that are not songs but blocks of refined and achieved and exemplary language." When that happens, children have "the guardian angel installed behind the tongue". Lucky readers, big or small.
1.The poetry of Hughes’s forerunners is characteristic of ______
[A] its natural, crude flavor.
[B] its distorted depiction of people’s daily life.
[C] its penetrating sight.
[D] its fantastical enthusiasm.
2.The word "vilified" most probably means _____
[A] tortured
[B] harassed
[C] scolded
[D] tormented
3.According to the third paragraph, Hughes’s collection of letters are _____
[A] personal recollection of his life.
[B] personalised historical chronicle of his literary engagement.
[C] reflections of his struggle with his devotion and the reality.
[D] his meditation on the literary world.
4. From the letters, we may find the cause of Hughes’s internal struggle is _____
[A] his devotion to the literary world.
[B] that he is a part-private, part-public creature.
[C] that he is constrained by the fear of his privacy being invaded.
[D] his fame and notoriety.
5. By "lucky readers" in the last sentence, the author means_____
[A] children who read poetry.
[B] children who have a headfull of songs.
[C] children who own blocks of refined and achieved and exemplary language.
[D] children who have the guardian angel installed behind the tongue