报考指南 百分网手机站

GMAT作文使用方法及

时间:2020-11-08 19:37:00 报考指南 我要投稿

GMAT作文模板使用方法及范文

  下面是小编整理的几个实用的GMAT作文模板使用方法及范文,提供给大家参考。

GMAT作文模板使用方法及范文

  【学生的作业】

  Para2:

  Undoubtedly, gov should take responsibility to subside art within limitation, because this can both promote the development of art of proper value and manipulate some side effect in the art’s boom, such as illegal speculation, at the same time.

  Q:第一句如果是“先承认前提就不要‘within limitation’”,此时怎么处理?

  Furthermore, this support will call up public right attitude to the art

  On the other hand, if gov provide whatever as the art industry wants, this will evoke the greed of this industry, thus breaking the social order. In other words(不可以放到下一段),……

  Besides, unlimited financial aid, such as appropriate and spiritual help, such as …, will weaken the investment on other public construction, such as office building, health care, etc.

  Q:是否这段太细所以把“on the other hand”的话说完了呢?

  III.结尾:

  1.展望未来:如果把握不好度容易无病呻吟,所以建议用第二种

  2. “欲擒故纵”:

  逻辑原理是:虽然我不同意这观点,但我承认在某些方面还是对的,列出什么好处。但是,就我看来,坏处overweight好处。[LC3]

  As given above, I disagree that gov should provide limited support to art. But(不要!) admittedly, it can also makes a different that gov meet whatever desire of the art industry in a short term: rescuing them from a financial crisis suddenly, recovering public’s confidence to the society and the market, etc. But all these above cannot amount to a greater thing than the side effects as I presented to me.

  【comments from老鹰】:

  1. 思维:可以

  2. 词汇和句子:很不好,太抽象。   II.具体框架Justification:根据分观点的关系有如下分类

  一、【第一种】并列性列举:大多数人这么写

  如果要这么写的要求是:越往后的分观点:越不能虚,要往实了写——

  因为方向一样的情况下,选择的分观点多了,就可能越往后面越没话,进而就偏虚,这样的坏处是:可能导致前后分观点存在包含关系,但是我开头的 “1st,2nd”表达的含义是它们是并列的,这样就产生了logical conflict!不好。

  Eg:是否同意“出国好”?

  1st :出国学到一些国际化的知识

  2nd: 出国可以积累人脉

  3rd: 出国可以长见识——错!

  或:把“出国可以长见识”放在开始也不可以!因为一来就虚了,后面的“学知识”“积累社会经验”等等都可以视为包含于它的,就错了!

  二、【第二种】 递进式

  层层展开——注意一个合理order:比如刚才那个不能说反了

  Eg:"Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced. "

  To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above?

  (1)破题:

  1) 同意:两句话都同意。这两句话的关系是第一句是第二句的前提。

  2) 不同意:可以weaken第一句或第二句,任意,但是usually是weaken第二句,因为第一句elaborate起来相对难一些,但是想得出来也可以。

  【看范文】:

  总观点:不同意。

  First, subsidizing the arts is neither a proper nor necessary job for government.

  ——这句话:weaken了前提“clearly”那句。

  Second, government cannot possibly play an evenhanded role as arts patron.

  ——这句话:承认前提,weaken第二句。

  所以,这么看下来,整个逻辑是:

  首先,政府就不应该支持。

  其次,即使政府应该支持,这个支持也应该是有限制性的。

  【注意】:请注意这里的logical order——

  如果两个分观点颠倒了顺序就不可以:因为下面那个的内容已经承认“要支持艺术了”,如果放到第一个,后面再来个“不同意支持艺术”,前后矛盾!

  三、【第三种】正反对比

  1. 逻辑原理:排除他因

  1) 正面:有/没有了这东西为什么好

  2) 反面:如果没有这东西,为什么不好或好。

  2. 措辞:

  1)正面:没有问题

  2)反面:不可以直接说“如果没有这东西”,这样就与分观点1的用词重复了,所以此时比较preferable的'方式是,列举一个“正面取非”的现象的子集。

  Eg:出国好不好?

  分观点1:出国如何好

  分观点2:在国内考研[LC2] 如何不好。

  3. 结构:大 小 大 小

  para1:出国的好处(后面+elaboration+justification)

  para2:furthermore,出国还怎么好(感觉与para1方向一致,进一步升华,视为一种进一步的elaboration)

  para3:国内考研的坏处(后面+elaboration+justification)

  para4:Besides,国内考研还……不好

  Q:是否可以在para4变为“国内工作”?

  【注意】:分段的Elaboration 需要indicator:specially,furthermore——递进conj

  段内的elaboration的indicator:in other words

  注意区别!  三、【第三种】是第二种的一种变式

  1. 疑问句或反问句(推荐后者,语气更强。比如:Doesn’t it…?)

  2 讲故事

  3 观点

  【注意】:

  2和3都一样,加上1,目的是:让读者感觉到你的调皮、淘气与可爱,让文章不至于那么死板,特别是对于已经比较boring的raters,这是一种从感情上拿分的方式!

  Eg:请自己通过下面这段话找出issue是什么

  Could the bad old days of economic decline be about to return? Since OPEC agreed to supply-cuts in March, the price of crude oil has jumped to almost $26 a barrel, up from less than $10 last December. This near-tripling of oil prices calls up scary memories of the 1973 oil shock, when prices quadrupled, and 1979-80, when they also almost tripled. Both previous shocks resulted in double-digit inflation and global economic decline. So where are the headlines warning of gloom and doom this time?

  Issue:石油涨价是否会导致经济衰退?

  可见,这段话是方向清楚的。

  Eg:学生练习——请分别用三种开头方式写一遍

  "A powerful business leader has far more opportunity to influence the course of a community or a nation than does any government official. " Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above

  (我的):

  第一种:很好

  The author argues that a leader of great ability can affect the operation of a society or a country more widely and deeply. Suppose that in a society filled with this conception, the public will ignore the function and effect of government, then gov’s work will lose support and even be intervered , thus losing proper control of some bad things: free ride, speculation, etc, which cannot be malpulated by business org. Thus, I hold that it is equally important…

  第二种:

  J, a powerful leader of corp K——the chief client of the estate company P, had less effect on the control of P’s vicious violation of ethic rules: heavy speculation than the intervene of gov. In 1990, the boom of P, P took advantage of this prime period to induce miracle amount of foreign money to the US and at the same time it charged vitally higher price of its 3rd office building near the Los Angeles airport, thus spiring the anger of public. Facing this situation, k stopped its relationship with P to punish P, but this won’t have a mearable change on P’s action, while gov improved the tax on their every office building to be sold largely——ultimately, P has to put its price down to the average leve. Therefore, in my opion, gov has a more far-reaching impact on the operation of a community or a nation.

  【存在的问题】:

  1)第一句:没有说政府的影响多的后果是什么,就只能让读者读出一个现象,但是读不出方向。

  我应该在我的文字中明确给出方向是什么。Ie:

  如果我支持“gov作用更重要”:就说“政府影响更大则有什么好处”或“企业影响更大有什么坏处”;

  如果我支持“企业应该作用更大”:就反之。

  而我目前的表述:只有“政府影响更大”,没有“后果如何”,就是事实出来了,观点没有,所以不行!

  【修改后】:第一句——

  Gov has larger effect on the control of the bad speculation of corp J, an estate company, than J’s chief client K, an medical corp, thus preventing the flowing of work force and further decline of stock price of J.[LC1]

  2)中间的elaboration太长太绕:让人读的烦、容易读不懂,必须改得短且精炼一些。

  第三种:

  Doesn’t a powerful leader can really affect a course of a nation more widely than the government?

  【说明】:

  以上3种属于高分的写法,但不是只局限于这3个,有自己认为好的也可以。

  在进入II之前,有一点说一下:关于“核心概念”和“概念间关系”的界定——

  (1) 原理:要对一个观点发表我的评论(同意或不同意),前提是知道这个观点是什么。而界定的目的就是“搞清楚题目什么”的过程!

  (2)怎么处理:基于1)——

  1) 如果题目本身很具体了(注意:具体≠简单,只是说概念的含义精确了不会ambiguous了):就不需要这步,因为没有必要,加上去是画蛇添足,违背了“every word tells”。

  比如:

  A)"Clearly, government has a responsibility to support the arts. However, if that support is going to produce anything of value, government must place no restrictions on the art that is produced. "

  To what extent do you agree or disagree with the opinion expressed above?

  B)是否同意“当今社会在网上找工作更好”

  以上两个就是很具象化的,不需要界定。

  2) 题目中存在一些抽象词、且关系不清楚,就需要先界定:在我看来,**是什么意思。

  比如:

  A)"What education fails to teach us is to see the human community as one. Rather than focus on the unique differences that separate one nation from another, education should focus on the similarities among all people and places on Earth."

  【分析】:对“共性”和“个性”应该界定一下

  B)"There is only one definition of success-to be able to spend your life in your own way. "

  【分析】:对“成功”界定一下。

  Q:怎么界定“成功”?因为这题中已经在问“def”了啊?

【GMAT作文模板使用方法及范文】相关文章:

1.2017年GMAT作文模板使用方法及参考范文

2.2016年GMAT作文模板使用方法及参考范文

3.2016年GMAT作文模板使用方法

4.2017年GMAT作文模板及范文

5.2017GMAT作文写作模板运用技巧及范文

6.2017年GMAT作文范文及解析

7.GMAT数学机经的巧妙使用方法

8.2016年GMAT作文指导及参考范文