GMAT优秀作文500字
The president of the company that produces Glabrous Shampoo argues against removing the ingredient HR2 from the shampoo even though a scientific study claims that prolonged use of HR2 can contribute to hair loss. Three reasons are cited as the basis for this decision. First, it is argued that since the scientific study involved only 500 subjects, it can be disregarded. Second, none of Glabrous customers have complained of problems during the past year. And, finally, Glabrous competitors use more HR2 per bottle than Glabrous. The presidents decision is problematic in several respects.
To begin with, the fact that the scientific study on HR2 involved only 500 subjects is insufficient grounds to dismiss the results of that study. If the subjects for the study were randomly chosen and represent a diverse cross section of the population of shampoo users, the results will be reliable regardless of the number of participants.
Next, the scientific study determined that prolonged use could contribute to hair loss. While prolonged use was not defined in the memorandum, the fact that none of Glabrous customers have complained of problems during the past year is not a reliable reason to believe that problems will not arise in the future.
【GMAT优秀作文500字】相关文章：
GMAT优秀作文欣赏12-18
英语GMAT写作优秀作文05-13
GMAT优秀英语作文gma04-28
2015关于gmat考试技巧「优秀篇」09-01
GMAT作文满分标准05-13
gmat作文满分的技巧05-18
GMAT满分作文03-09
GMAT作文模板句型10-29
GMAT考试中复习GMAT数学的建议方法05-10